I was at APA last summer and I remember one idea
so vividly. I walked in on the tail end of a panel and as I quietly
tip-toed in from the back, Dr. Melba Vasquez was in the middle of her brief
talk. One of the things that she shared was that she thought for so long
that her involvement (tremendous professional involvement!) was service.
Now, service is not a bad thing. Service is a
wonderful thing! Think about all of the things that we can accomplish as
a society because of the service of others – paid and unpaid. But, the
issue that Dr. Vasquez clarified was that she never really considered her
multiple positions and accomplishments to be leadership.
I could not believe it. I was shocked. I
certainly considered Dr. Vasquez a leader – even the definition of leader in
the field of psychology! She was APA president in 2011 (when I started graduate
school!), the first Latina president of APA, president of several divisions of
APA (including Division 35 and Division 17), cofounded the Society for the
Psychological Study of Ethnic Minority Issus (Division 45) and has authored
several texts in the field of psychology – among numerous other
accomplishments. For her to bring up that she spent a good part of career
considering the work she did to be service instead of leadership
was thought provoking for me.
The idea of leadership has a different feel than
service. I have been sitting on this distinction for seven months now
because I had never considered what I do in my professional and personal life
to be leadership. When I bring this up with my colleagues and friends to
process they inevitably respond by “What?! You don’t consider yourself a
leader?!”
Well… no. Not until now.
I’ve always considered my work service – improving
my community, serving the university, and addressing issues of inequality and
justice across the board. I never considered any of these things
leadership. It has always service – my duty, my responsibility, my
calling.
I do not believe for one second that I am the
first person to think to myself that all of my involvement is service.
When I have thought of leadership in the past I have that automatic,
nagging voice telling me "NO! Leadership is dominating,
non-egalitarian nonsense! Unless you’re a good/one-of-a-kind
leader." I have my own images of the amazing people
throughout history who I see as amazing “special” leaders – Melba Vasquez, Rosa
Parks, Mahatma Gandhi, Angela Davis, Dr. Martin Luther King, Anita Roddick,
Gloria Steinem, bell hooks… those people are leaders. They change
society. They move and shake the world – either in its entirety or the
smaller worlds that they were/are a part of.
It has only been recently that I have been able
to refer to myself as a leader – all with
the help of Dr. Vasquez and me wandering in to a panel at APA last
summer. I never considered the distinction between service and leadership
until that moment and I do not think I could be the conscientious leader I am
without having faced this distinction.
I am a leader in many aspects of my life.
I think it’s time for me to own it.
Does anyone else feel similarly about being
hesitant to call themselves a leader? If not, was it a process and when did you
start calling yourself a leader?
- Written by Samantha D. Christopher, M.A.
No comments:
Post a Comment