When I was a little girl, my choice of toys was rather
gender neutral. Of course, I had the requisite Barbie “girl” toys, but I also
got to enjoy Matchbox and LEGO “boy” toys. Before the Nintendo Entertainment
System came out, those were my favorites. As I got older, my interest in Barbie
and Matchbox disappeared but to this very day, I still love LEGO. It’s
something much more than nostalgia because I don’t reminisce when I put
together a new set. It’s not just a toy, it’s a new experience. For me, putting
together a LEGO set is my version of building a ship in a bottle. The more
complex a set is the more pride I feel from completing it. Yeah, I’m a
professional woman in my 30’s who loves playing with LEGO. My most recent
vacation included a trip to LEGOland California where I basked in brick glory
and purchased more LEGO sets than I probably should have. It was worth it.
My relationship with my hobby has changed and matured as I
have. It’s no longer playing, it’s a project. When a project is finished, I
don’t disassemble it and place it back in a box. I proudly display it on a
shelf like a treasured artifact alongside family heirlooms and vacation
mementos; proof of the history and adventure of living. Essentially, LEGO is a
component of my personal identity. My personal identity has been shaped and
molded by my experiences and over time my personal convictions about gender
norms and feminism have become more pronounced. I have never been a fan of
prescriptive gender roles and stereotypes. The marketing gender divide in the
toy industry is probably where I got my first taste of them. LEGO has been
personally congruent for three decades and when LEGO introduced their “Friends”
line of “girl” products I had strong feelings about it.
LEGO products have been primarily marketed to boys
throughout my childhood and into my adulthood. In January 2012, LEGO attempted
to market to girls by creating the Friends line of sets and received sharp
criticism from consumers. The Friends sets were largely pink and purple
pastels, themed with stereotypically “female” interests (baking, hairstyling,
caregiving, and homemaking), and essentially segregated LEGO products by
gender. This gender segregation is nothing new. Anita Sarkeesian of Feminist
Frequency produced a two-part video series about LEGO and gender which
highlighted marketing used to sell gender stereotypes to both girls and boys.
Many “boy” sets have a focus on weaponry and violence. Such marketing
reinforces gender segregation in play and has not always been LEGO’s marketing
focus. From the 1940’s to 1980’s, LEGO advertising featured girls, boys, and
parents building the same, gender-neutral sets cooperatively and creatively.
The emphasis was on building and creativity, the hallmark features of LEGO, not
shooting things or getting your hair done.
LEGO has promised to do better. In September 2013, LEGO
released a female lab scientist minifigure (minifig for short), which was a
small step in the right direction. Now, in June 2014, LEGO announced plans to
release the Female Scientist Minifigure set, which features three female
scientist minifigs and accompanying accessories signifying the professions of
astronomy, chemistry, and paleontology. The minifigs are of classic LEGO design
and avoid extreme gender stereotypes. One problem, however, is the homogeneous
“yellow” skin tone of most minifigs. Historically, there have been variations
in minifig skin tones but they are largely yellow. There has been criticism of
the lack of varying skin tones in minifigs but it is largely overshadowed by
the call for more gender diversity and equality. LEGO really shouldn’t forget
the other forms of diversity.
LEGO in the non-brick realm of marketing has also been
impacted by gendered marketing. The LEGO Movie was released in February 2014
and Chris McKay, the film’s director, admitted it does not pass the Bechdel
Test. Promisingly, he stated a desire to do better by female characters in the
upcoming sequel and expressed that filmmakers have a responsibility to examine
the culture of gendered stereotypes and create films with characters with more
depth than stereotypes.. This is progress but it is not the end of the tunnel.
LEGO, and consumer culture in general, has a way to go to include better
representations of women, gender non-conforming people, people of color, sexual
minorities, and people with disabilities. However, these considerations help to
build a better future.
LEGO Portrait of the
Author
-Written by Victoria L. Wu, MS
Resources
No comments:
Post a Comment