Pages

Saturday, February 25, 2017

Self-care: A Topic Often Brought up, but Rarely Understood // Annika Johnson


Source: CanStockPhoto/csp194223900

During the first year of my doctoral program, the topic of self-care was introduced. When it came time for me to share my “self-care strategy” I stated, “ummm binge watch Netflix, and uhh..” The truth was I had no idea what self-care was, but I was imagining it was what I do when I am worn out. It didn’t take long for me to learn that binge watching Netflix after running myself into the ground is not self-care. So back to the drawing board I went. In the last nine months, I’ve begun to think of self-care as preventative medicine; it is intended to prevent burnout, not just manage it once it has occurred.

We often hear reference to self-care after an elaborate shopping trip or a day at the spa, and pampering ourselves is an important element of self-care, it is not the only element. There are four basic steps of self-care that are often easy to overlook. Staying hydrated, eating healthy, exercise, and sleep. We’ve heard this our whole lives, and yet there are a million reasons why we neglect these four things. Beginning with hydration, water is our body’s best friend. The average female needs at least 2 liters of water a day, and males need at least 2.5 liters. And as much as we want them to, coffee and other caffeinated beverages do not count when considering hydration. Then eating, for some of us eating three meals a day is a challenge, so begin there. Better yet, eat three nutritious meals that lack in artificial ingredients. Now exercise, exercise is tough because we often think of self-care as “rest”, and we don’t typically think of exercise when we think of rest. However, to achieve quality rest, we need exercise because exercise is the best way to reduce stress hormones. Finally, sleep, as students there is often this idea that we can “make up” sleep on the weekends, but unfortunately there is no way to regain the sleep we have lost. For healthy functioning the average adult requires 6-8 hours of sleep a night.

I can see why these four things are often overlooked; they seem elementary. These are the four most primal self-care strategies, and yet they are not easy, at least not for me. There have been days where every single one of my “well balanced meals” contained copious amounts of peanut butter. Or days where I have carried my water bottle around all day, and haven’t even had a sip until noon. There was that one time where my “It’s ok to take one day off from exercise” turned into 9 days without exercise. And, there have been many times where I have sat in a classroom feeling guilt and shame about the 8 hours of sleep I achieved the night before. As a society, we do not value self-care, we value hard work and selflessness. There is often an internal battle in my head, if I have time for 8 hours of sleep does that mean I am working hard enough? Along with echoes of “There is not enough time.”

Since I have begun to care for my body in these four basic ways my life has drastically improved. Most notably, my immune system is stronger, resulting in improved attendance. Not only that, but when I do attend I have the strength to remain present, and to engage fully. Additionally, my relationships have improved; I find myself being a better partner, friend, and peer. Self-care and hard work are considered dichotomous in our current Western culture. However, when self-care is practiced, we realize hard work alone does not equal our best work. Our best work cannot be achieved without actual self-care.

Written by: Annika Johnson

The Power of Storytelling in the Age of Trump // Talia Schulder



Trump’s campaign relied on his false ability to speak for others. He claimed to know what was best for all Americans and repeatedly shared his narrative of making America great again. This narrative was believable for many people, its plot and characters, heroes and villains, tapped into the minds of the many Americans that went to the polls for him. Trump’s mythic tale may have persuaded many, but it warped the real lives and histories of many others in this country and around the world. He claimed their stories were his to tell, and if one thing is to be learned from this, it’s that for people to heal from this narrative theft, they must be given the power and encouragement to share and spread their own stories. They are the only ones who can speak on behalf of their experiences. They are the only ones who can write the truth about their own lives.
Storytelling may have been the means for Trump to win, but it can also be the means to fight against the lies he spread. Many communities from different regions and backgrounds were repeatedly targeted in his narrative; they were represented with statistical deceits and anecdotal attacks. These can be traumatic both for the literal and immediate dangers of racism and executive orders, but also for the effect this has on the voices of the marginalized. This told oppressed people that Trump could take their own lives and make it into a story with flaws and falsehoods; he could strip them of their ability to speak for themselves and have a large proportion of the country agree with his decision. As a creative writing major, I have benefitted from the act of outlining my thoughts in a creative and organized way and knowing that people are reading and learning about my hardships. Individuals and communities who have been warped in the nationalism of Trump’s fables must reclaim their experiences through writing their own stories both privately and publically.
Narrative Exposure Therapy (NET) is a short-term treatment often used for refugees and asylum seekers with PTSD. It asks an individual to reorganize their experiences and traumas into a chronological narrative, both to help their minds organize these upsetting experiences and to help the individual feel control over their lives, to feel that they have the power to form the stories that represent them and give a voice to their own experiences (Robjant and Fazel 2010). This therapeutic model can be applied to the millions of refugees that have been refused asylum in America, and can also be expanded and used on the countless Americans who feel they were and are unheard under the new administration. Storytelling both gives a literal voice to millions of people who are ignored and oppressed, but also gives people the power to find their own voice amongst the rollercoaster that is occurring around them. Knowing that their voices are diverse, loud, and clear, and that their experiences matter, could help give hope to the billions of potential storytellers who’s stories Trump is trying to erase with the stroke of a pen.


Green, D. (2017). Demystifying People Analytics – Part 3: The power of
            storytellingHRNBlog. Retrieved 21 February 2017, from
            https://blog.hrn.io/demystifying-people-analytics-part-3-the-power-of-
            storytelling/

Robjant, K. & Fazel, M. (2010). The emerging evidence for Narrative Exposure
            Therapy: A review. Clinical Psychology Review30(8), 1030-1039.
            doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2010.07.004

Risks taken by Smart Women and why I still want to be one when I Grow Up // Renee Hangartner, M.A.



Again, my inspiration came from the brilliant mind of Shonda Rhimes, via Grey’s Anatomy.  This blog is called FemPop and I get my inspiration from popular culture. I make no apologies for that. On season 13, episode 13, the women at Grey-Sloane Memorial Hospital are doing their jobs, kicking ass, and taking names, you know, saving lives; but their husbands seem to be having a hard time dealing. Dr. Miranda Bailey, Chief of Surgery, is making very unpopular decisions that are directly in opposition to her predecessor, Dr. Richard Webber.  She has brought in a female, teaching consultant which has ruffled everyone’s feathers.  The attending doctors actually decide to systematically ostracize her, men and women, using relational aggression. Then, the attendings unanimously refuse to show up to a meeting Dr. Miranda Bailey calls to put a stop to this behavior.  Would this have ever happened to the previous Chief of Surgery? Probably not, because he is a man. While the argument could be made that the political implications surrounding her decisions are the real motivations behind such defiant behavior, this is a recurring theme in the episode and I believe it reflects the state of affairs in the real world. Dr. Bailey is married to a resident, someone who is far below her in rank and power at the hospital. Sure, there are some conflicts of interest; but he is her partner first and they have an agreement, “separation of church and state”, meaning work does not get brought home.  In this episode, he won’t even engage with her on the topic.  This smart woman, who is the boss, and has exercised her power, is alone, even at home. Dr. Richard Webber is married to Dr. Catherine Avery, who pretty much owns the hospital.  This is another example of an imbalance of power that goes against traditional gender norms.  They too fight about what is going on at the hospital. Her motives, decisions, and way she exerts her power is questioned by her husband. Interestingly, Dr. Avery is the one who encouraged Dr. Bailey to own her power and do what she felt was best for the hospital, even if it made her unpopular. The next decision Dr. Bailey makes shakes the very foundation of the show, she suspends Dr. Meredith Grey for insubordination. This creates an even stronger divide among the main players and now two women are pitted against each other. A not so likely choice for her replacement creates problems in another heterosexual relationship. Dr. April Kepner is promoted to Interim Chief of General Surgery. Dr. Kepner is your typical “nice girl”, she smiles, follows the rules, and never imagined she’d have a baby after she got divorced. She is now accused of being “opportunistic” and power hungry.  Now, I understand that everyone loves Dr. Meredith Grey and she is portrayed as a superior surgeon; but Dr. April Kepner is doing her job and doing what is best for the hospital; this position needs to be filled.  Also, despite her traditional gender traits, she is getting to experience power and recognition for her own abilities.  All of that is undermined and she too can’t share this new role, with its struggles and triumphs with her baby’s father, Dr. Jackson Avery (Dr. Catherine Avery’s son) who questions whether she got the position because of her merit. The story comes full circle as Dr. Catherine Avery takes Dr. April Kepner, her once daughter-in-law, under her wing and bolsters her as a smart woman, who is secure in herself should. The episode ends with a preview for the next week showing Dr. Bailey asking Dr. Grey to deal with this like “smart women”. This is really the point.  The divide within the hospital crosses genders and while it is first Team Bailey vs. Team Webber, it then becomes Team Bailey vs. Team Grey. To me, this episode portrays how women, even at the top of their respected professions can be catty and sometimes act on their first instinct to tear the other woman down. The episode also shows how others can instigate and promote this type of behavior. This 42 minute episode reminds us that a smart woman can be seen as dangerous to the status quo.  The episode made me angry and frustrated.  The imaginary world of Shondaland is progressive and feminist and maybe that’s why this story was told there.  These interpersonal conflicts among smart women of color are usually ignored. Other story lines center on a woman’s love interest or a white man’s struggle.  This would all be background noise on another medical drama.  Thank you Shonda for using your show as a platform to tell stories usually ignored. I was reminded while watching this week’s show that there are still people in our society, in 2017, who will stop at nothing to pull down a smart woman off her pedestal. A smart woman is one who persists, who continues her work while losing popularity, rises above name calling (i.e. nasty woman) and risks isolation and yet is someone to be admired.

Sunday, February 19, 2017

Misoprostol, Coat Hangers, and Trump: Foreign Objects in Our Wombs // Assata Baxter



In the United States, one in three of us has had one. We don’t share this. In the midst of making hard decisions, we bear the vitriolic harassment of those who have never and will never carry children, or those who chose to project the insecurities of their own decisions on others, before we can get to the door. We are blamed and shamed in clinic parking lots with pictures of 56 week old dead fetuses. We enter clinics alone without our partners’ knowledge, weighted with surprises in pink lines when it’s not yet our time. Or our partners hold our hands and say that whatever we choose they are beside us.  Or depending where we are in a low-income country, there may be no clinics. So, we ask our friends if anyone has a doctor in the family who can write a prescription; anyone who knows someone who knows someone who works at a pharmacy.  We look up which combination of pills it requires, and pray that it works. We go to sangomas in another village. We put our lives in the hands of “surgeons” and hope that we wake up with use of our reproductive organs… or that we wake up period. There are no certain answers. No “do-it-yourself” manuals. And every 8 minutes in low-income countries, one of us will die of complications arising from it.

We don’t announce our decisions of Facebook, or post pictures to Instagram of the sonogram, of the fetus we have chosen not to keep. We may tell some close to us, but often we don’t tell our best friends, our parents, our siblings, sometimes our partners. We are afraid their religion or recently recognized righteousness will get in the way of them hearing us…that they will guilt us into thinking otherwise, or it may change forever how they see us.  We fear scarlet letter branding. We talk in hushed whispers if at all. Sometimes we find support groups. Sometimes we continue life as usual. Sometimes we are forever changed. While our experiences are different, what remains consistent is that abortion sits squarely at the juncture of ethics, religion, morals, science, gender and politics. And yet the discussion of the experience remains taboo.  

            I have had two abortions; one in Kenya, one in Djibouti, both “back alley”, in the sense that they lacked medical supervision or prescription. I was not raped. My health was not in danger. Simply, neither the birth control, nor the morning after pill worked. I give you these moderating factors for two reasons. One, because the myth often goes that underserved populations use abortion as birth control. This was not the case. Further these very factors had both an impact on my conscience and impacted accessibility to any legal type of procedure.  

            My period was a week late. But, my period was always a little bit hard to calculate. It didn’t cross my mind that I could be pregnant until week two. We always used protection, and our one accident, I had taken the morning after pill. I bought a take-home pregnancy test at the nearby market. I remember crouching on the floor of my apartment in south B, Nairobi watching the Test line appear. The test was supposed to take three minutes, but positives appear faster… and even the few seconds it took, seemed like a lifetime. I rocked back and forth, hugging my knees to my chest, crying… I called my boyfriend, shaking, inconsolable, tears pouring down my face. He rushed over and held me as I cried myself to sleep. I wished it happened like in the movies. The girl who finds herself pregnant always magically miscarriages. She never actually has to make a decision. She can share her story freely, with whoever chooses to listen, because miscarriages are not of our choosing. They are not our fault or our choice. They are met with sorrow or pity or empathy, because they are God’s will or the will of the Universe or whomever we believe in. We hold no “fault”.

But it did not happen like the movies. I bought three more pregnancy tests the next week. I convinced myself I had ovarian cysts, that I kept contaminating the urine sample, or that the pharmacy by my house was selling expired tests. By the end of the week, I started having dizzy spells. I was beginning to feel nauseous quite often, but I had three days off work before heading to rural Uganda for work, and so the race against the clock started. The next day I woke up I felt awful, and depressed. I wanted to see a doctor. That would be the only way to know for sure. We made an appointment at a nearby hospital. I explained the situation and they too thought that pregnancy was unlikely, particularly given the dates of my last period and encouraged me to do an ultrasound. I agreed. For once and for all, I would know.

My memories of the next few moments that day are very blurred. I remember hearing a heartbeat. I remember crying and heaving in some corner in the hospital. I remember I went home with a sonogram as a parting gift, that I have never brought myself to discard.  But I did not want to have a baby, even after heartbeats and sonograms. I was 24, living and working in Kenya on 2000 USD a month, with an ocean separating me from my family, and financially supporting a sick mother back at home. I was six weeks pregnant, and I did not want to be a mother, then… the same way I am unsure if I want to be a mother now.  I knew immediately what I wanted to do, but had no idea how to do it, and having chosen to abort, there was nothing more that I wanted than to stop being pregnant. In my mind, I kept thinking the longer I waited, the closer the fetus came to viability, or to what in my mind was personhood.  However, figuring out what to do was not easy. There is no “Planned Parenthood” in Kenya. I could not make an appointment to discuss my options.  Abortion is and was illegal in Kenya, and only viable to save a woman’s life or preserve her physical health.

I was not willing to wait any amount of weeks to try and fly to another country and come back. I also was not willing to literally have a back alley surgical abortion. I had one or two friends I confided in, who might have known someone who had “the surgery”. I was not willing to risk my future reproductive health or a return to consciousness being unsure of what had been cut, or poked or inserted inside of my body.  Here there was no RU-486. We had to find a doctor who would be willing to write a prescription for the pills I would need to give myself a medical abortion. We could not get it in the pharmacy without a prescription. We found a doctor who was willing to write a prescription however the dosage was not enough. It was for only 200mcg. We made copies of the prescription. We bribed pharmacists to give us more until we had 800mcg. There were multiple websites with multiple directions. I chose one and stuck with it. I put a pill under my tongue, wrote a letter to my unborn child, and asked for her forgiveness and to come back when it was her time. I wore a pad for the rest of the night. And in the morning, it was just as if I started my period. And that was it. I no longer felt nauseous. I just had what felt like period cramps... At least I thought that was it. I headed to Uganda for work. The secret safe between my boyfriend and I.

For the next two days life, continued as somewhat normal. However the third day, I had cramps far worse than any period I had ever had. They were so painful that I had to bite on a towel to keep from screaming out, every time I used the bathroom. I struggled through my work day, taking multiple breaks per hour. I was dizzy, sweating, and nauseous. Day four, I had what I realize now was probably Class Two hemorrhaging. I woke up to blood everywhere in the sheets. I wouldn’t stop bleeding. In a town in far West Uganda, coming from the bathroom, too weak to walk, I tried to crawl back to bed, but could not make it. So, I lay on the cold floor of a hotel room, entering and exiting consciousness until morning; bleeding uncontrollably, until a friend found me in the morning. I never did see a doctor, but the process of healing from both the physical and psychological wounds was a long one. The psychological wounds remained because the physical damage to my body, the anticipated lack of support, my suffering in physical and emotional pain in silence, the battle of my conscience, and the feeling of utter loneliness did not leave immediately. But I survived… which makes me a lucky one.

International Access to Abortion

Imagine that approximately 310,000 women undergo abortions in secrecy each year in Kenya alone, according to the East Africa Centre for Law and Justice[i]. 21,000 women are admitted each year as a result of complications related to unsafe abortions, which are usually undertaken in back alley clinics. 2,600 of these women eventually die. Research from the Center for Reproductive Rights has found that unsafe abortions account for 40% of the maternal mortality rate[ii]. I was fortunate enough to have a supportive boyfriend, and enough financial capital to be able to afford both seeing private doctors, and paying the costs of both prescriptions and bribes. I know that is a privilege not all women have in Kenya. Due to restricted abortion legislation, even with the new constitution, women, less than having access to a medically safe procedure, do not even have access to the human contact that would provide them with the support and empathy they seek, and the tools they would need to make an informed decision.

In sub-Saharan Africa, 98% of countries allow abortions to save the mother’s life, however only 33% permit abortion in cases of rape or incest and only two allow elective abortions for any reason. But, I will point fingers neither at Kenya, nor the continent of Africa. Kenya is not the only country with restrictive abortion legislation. In fact the countries with the most restrictive abortion legislation are found in Europe, Central and South America.  The Holy See (Vatican City), Malta, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Nicaragua and Chile  do not allow abortion under any circumstances, even if the mother will die from complications prior to or giving birth[iii].

According to Pew Research Centre, although in Europe about 73% of countries allow abortions for any reason, Ireland, Andorra (between France and Spain) and San Marino (Italy) only allow abortions in order to save the life of the mother. In Ireland, illegal abortion carries a sentence of up to 14 years in prison. And therefore, more than 5000 women each year are forced to leave the country to have abortions outside of Ireland[iv]. These same studies have revealed that 26% of countries in the world only allow abortion to save a mother’s life; and 42% allow abortions only when the mother’s life is at risk in combination with at least one other specific reason, such as to preserve a woman’s physical or mental health, in cases of rape or incest, because of fetal impairment or for social or economic reasons”[v]. According to the World Health Organization 21.6 million women undergo unsafe abortions every year[vi]. Of those, 6.9 million women were treated for complications from unsafe abortions. I form part of the 40% of women who experienced complications but never received treatment. Unsurprisingly, almost all abortion-related deaths occur in low-income countries, with the highest number occurring in Africa. The Guttmacher Institute, according to recent studies have found that 8–18% of maternal deaths worldwide are due to unsafe abortion, and the number of abortion-related deaths in 2014 ranged from 22,500 to 44,000[vii].

What these numbers and percentages mean, is that beyond any discussion about population control in low-income countries, at what specific age human life becomes viable, if abortion is morally right or wrong, the after-life consequences of our actions, is that women are literally dying trying to get abortions, often of the surgical kind.

Trump in Our Wombs

The 1973 Helms Amendment, created in the wake of the Roe v. Wade decision, prevents the use of American foreign aid for abortions. The caveat being that the money could still be used to fund family planning, or educate women about abortions, but could not be allocated to the procedure itself. On January 23rd 2017, beneath our noses, President Trump signed an executive order which reinstated the “global gag rule”. Effectively this rule bans federal funding for international non-governmental organizations that offer abortions, advocate for the right to an abortion, or even discuss abortion as an option to mothers. In the past this order known as the “Mexico-City Policy”, has been instituted by Republicans and struck down by Democrats multiple times. Yet the massive degree of funding that will be affected by this gag order is absolutely unprecedented. The gag rule will apply to about $9.5 billion dollars in global health funding which will effect organizations mostly in low and middle income countries. These cuts may even effect HIV prevention and treatment, and maternal health care. Conservative estimates by the Guttmacher Institute project that the result will be 38,000 more abortions. Marie Stopes International estimates that the global gag rule will lead to an additional 2.2 million abortions worldwide, and given the restrictive abortion policies in 68% of countries, a vast majority of these will be unsafe abortions.


Basta de Rosarios en Nuestros Ovarios (No More Rosaries in Our Ovaries)

While it is impossible to project definitively, I wonder how many more women will die this way, unaccounted for, afraid, hemorrhaging to death on the floor of a hotel room, or during surgery  in the room of a back office with no windows, where her body may simply be disposed of, to ensure the continued financial gain of the “clinic”. This unnecessary maternal mortality is a direct byproduct of desperation in environments that stigmatize and demonize women for unintentionally becoming pregnant, for whatever reason, and then punish them by restricting access to services. On top of this, with funding basically drained to international and national NGOs who specialize in family planning, pregnancy prevention, and pre- and post-counseling, women, especially in low-income countries are left very alone.  I took years to heal from my psychological wounds. I never once regretted my decision. But I almost lost my life in the process.  Reproductive rights belong to those who are doing the reproducing. Trump’s intrusion into our wombs, essentially has reached into our bodies to yank away reproductive rights with fetal heartbeat bills and global gag rules. As has happened historically, when autonomy over our own bodies is taken away, we as women we will find a way to take it back. Banning abortion, or cutting funding to organizations that even discuss abortion will not make abortion disappear, it will only result in the unnecessary death of 50,000 women a year by knitting needle, Misoprostol and coat hangers.

-Assata Baxter


[ii] https://www.reproductiverights.org/initiatives/maternal-mortality
[iii] http://www.care2.com/causes/the-5-countries-that-would-let-a-woman-die-before-getting-an-abortion.html
[iv] http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/10/06/how-abortion-is-regulated-around-the-world/
[vi] http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/topics/unsafe_abortion/magnitude/en/

Politics in Therapy: Connecting with Clients who Support Trump // Renee Mikorski, M.S.






I want to start off my blog post with a story. Last week, my colleague in Counseling Psychology and I were running a group at our clinical placement, which is a substance abuse treatment center in conservative East Tennessee. The group was all men, and it was a process-oriented group that ended up focusing on trauma that particular week. The group started off innocently enough- there were a lot of veterans, one police officer, and one railroad engineer who all talked very genuinely about their traumatic experiences in the field. There was a lot of anger, sadness, and frustration in the room. However, the discussion quickly derailed when one client started taking his anger and displacing it onto the Black Lives Matter movement. His words were along the lines of “we’ve been through so much, what do those people have to complain about?”. In that moment, another group member jumped in and began to defend BLM by saying “you can’t judge them, you don’t know what they’ve been through”. Luckily, I was able to redirect the conversation easily back to talking about trauma.

However, this moment, among others at the same clinical site have got me thinking about working with clients who explicitly espouse political views that are very different from mine. How do I work with clients who explicitly endorse Trump and talk about it in the room? How do I work with clients who displace their anger over going through a traumatic experience onto the Black Lives Matter movement? Or clients who wear “veterans over refugees” shirts in the therapy room? These are questions that have been going through my mind as I continue my work with these clients.

Of course, I realize that therapy is about the mental health of the client and not about my own views. However, coming from a feminist therapy orientation, I believe in bringing at least part of myself into the room in order to even out the power differential between therapist and client. Therefore, does that mean I cannot truly be myself with these clients? Can this be something that would create a gap in my empathy for them? We feel more connected to those who are like us in some ways and disconnected to those who are different. However, through my multicultural training and experiences in the field I know that it is important to build bridges across differences in order to give the client the best care possible. In addition, I believe these clients deserve the care and empathy given to any other client who may walk into my office.

As I continued to think about this seemingly unsolvable issue, a thought crossed my mind. Since I identify as politically radical in a lot of ways, I thought why not extend this idea of being radical into therapy? Using radical empathy may be one way to connect to clients who may cause strong reactions in me due to their political beliefs. Although radical empathy has been defined several ways, I will personally define it as the concept of using empathy as an act of political protest by caring for others in the face of a world that is hateful and oppressive. As a feminist therapy using radical empathy to truly care for others who believe that Black lives don’t matter, that women do not deserve access to reproductive healthcare, and that LGBT people are defective is a way to protest the hate that these opposing political views represent. I realize this will not be easy, but it will be necessary in order for me to connect with these clients who I truly care about as well as a way to stay true to myself. It is a way for me to take the high road that Michelle Obama encouraged us all to do in the face of adversity. It a way to remind me that love will always trump hate.

Written by: Renee Mikorski, M. S.

You are more than your productivity // Kenya Crawford




            While being a graduate student it’s easy to get stuck in the mindset that you must always be achieving. More often than not, achieving typically includes acing your comprehensive exams, getting accepted to a leading conference in your field, or getting that IRB approval you’ve been waiting on. While these accomplishments are extremely difficult to achieve these achievements do not equate to your worth. While we may spend hours on literature reviews, prepping for clients, or keeping up to date on the most recent research, it’s easy to lose ourselves in our work.
            Many graduate students tend to pride themselves on working long hours or juggling multiple responsibilities. These abilities are heavily linked to your success, but how often are they taking away from your life. When was the last time you did something for sole enjoyment? Not with the intention of future praise. How often are you taking time for yourself? If you are anything like me, you may have multiple calendars and post-it notes to keep you on track. Try making a list of self-care options and doing at least one. Do at least one thing for yourself, daily. Don’t wait, because life is passing you by.  

Every now and then it’s important to stay true to you. You are not solely your degree, your C.V., or your LinkedIn profile. You are a holistic being with so much more to offer. You are so much more than your productivity. 

Monday, February 13, 2017

Feminism Without Intersectionality Is Just White Supremacy // Anna Bartko, M.A.



Photo from: Google Images/Twitter

As the past presidential election dwindled to the last few months, Donald Trump called Hillary Clinton a “nasty woman”. This has now been a popular phrase among this wave of “feminism” that has come to the forefront of the current political sphere. This phrase went viral in many ways, not only were women working towards reclaiming the phrase for themselves, but turned into a clear representation of consumer based activism that lends itself to be ultimately problematic.  It has manifested into a capitalistic endeavor with shirts, mugs, phone cases, totes, etc. with this phrase displayed all over it. We can see its popularity as we look back at the Women’s March from January 21st.

However popular this phrase and new brand of consumer feminism is, I am writing, as a white, queer, cis-gendered woman, to introduce a critique that this phrase may not be as inclusive as people think and is only safe and accessible to those with white and cis privileges.

White feminism is and has been an inherent problem within the feminist movements. It allows for white supremacy to take hold of a movement and let this oppression seep into their politics and stances. This is where the importance of intersectionality comes in. Feminism is and should be critiqued for the ways that is it is non-inclusive of gender and queer identities (i.e. “Pussy grabs back”) and that being self-labeling as “nasty” may not be safe for everyone to wear blindly on merchandise.

When we look at history and the way that “feminism” is taught in America, we must realize that women of color have been the backbone of feminism. We also must consider how capitalism is a driving force of social and wealth inequality and how the production and profit of goods (that may represent something you believe in) are ultimately contributing to the larger systems of inequity at work.

White women: we must come up with more effective ways to support marginalized people instead of blindly accepting a phrase and then turning into a capitalistic endeavor. Even if this has come from the self-proclaimed “left” and “liberal” side of politics, we must call out forms of white supremacy when we see it to make sure that the spaces that are created are safe and accessible to all.

In the current political sphere it is even more important that we must call out the spaces that we inherently take up and demand that they be more inclusive. White women have to look critically at their privilege, accept and feel the fragility that it may bring up, and become accountable for our words and actions. We must do the work, call out the systems we benefit from, and actively work through a lens of intersectionality.

Written by: Anna Bartko, M.A.



Men Matter: Changes in How Male Love Interests are Portrayed in Disney Films // Abigail Walsh

Disney movies have been, and still are in many ways, the pinnacle of children’s media. These movies display certain themes to young boys and girls. Children learn about themselves and others, as well as the rules of the world through popular media (Lee, 2008). The information gathered from these films may contribute to children’s understanding of gender, particularly surrounding gender roles and gender traits – what is and isn’t okay for boys and girls to be, to do, and how to act. We can define gender roles as, “the patterns of behavior that are culturally expected of “normal” men and women” (Miller & Perlman, 2009). These norms provide a comparison against which one can judge others to see how well they fit into society. Traditional gender roles often reflect men in roles outside of the home, while female gender roles traditionally reflect a woman’s duty inside of the home. Men are expected to be strong and brave and women are expected to be feminine and docile.
A lot has been written about how women are portrayed in Disney films, particularly Disney princesses. In general, these women are portrayed in very stereotypical and traditional gender roles, and have very predictable paths in the films. Some of the most common examples of stereotypical representations come from Disney classics, such as Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs (Cottrell, W., Hand, D., Jackson, W., & Morey, L., 1937) and Cinderella (Geronimi, Jackson, & Luske, 1950).
With so much focus on Disney princesses, it is important to recognize that princesses are not the only ones being shown repetitive stereotypical role models in Disney films. The male characters in the Disney princess films all engage in traditional gender roles. They are saviors, protectors, and physical. They like to hunt. They are aggressive. They take control and maintain control throughout much of the movies. Sometimes they are jokesters, but even these male characters show some sort of traditional roles. And in the end the man always figures it out and saves the day. More often than not, this can be seen in some sort of display of physical action. There is often a fighting scene where the man literally fights to “win” the princess (because she is a possession that can be “won”). This can be seen in characters like Gaston, Aladdin, Prince Charming, the Beast, Eric from the little Mermaid, and the list goes on and on.
Recently Disney has teamed up with Pixar studios to present male lead characters in a softer light. In movies like Cars, Toy Story, and The Incredibles, men are portrayed in a new model of masculinity. In this “New Man” model, all the characters are alpha males that face some sort of emasculating failure. They then have some sort of goal, usually involving winning over affection from a female character, but sometimes for platonic male friendship. In the end these characters come to some realization and become a kinder and gentler representation of what it means to be a man (Gilliam & Wooden, 2008).
This move is in line with a larger cultural movement of revolutionizing male gender roles (Gilliam & Wooden, 2008). And this move towards a new man should be applauded. Boys also need different kinds of role models to encourage growth and development in a modern world. However, the move in this direction really needs to be credited to Pixar. Toy Story was the first of these movies to move in this direction in 1995. While that seems like a great stride, without the influence of Pixar studios, Disney did not release a newer model of masculinity to the masses on their own until 2010. This is 15 years later, and it should be noted that it seems to have taken Disney much longer to conform to this revolution.
In 2010, Tangled was released. This is the first film that portrays a desirable male character in a non-traditional light. Flynn is a humorous character. He is a thief, but not a very good one. He is not a good fighter. He runs away at the face of danger instead of confronting it. He is not in control and really doesn’t have it together. However, he is still portrayed in an amicable light. It all works out in the end for him and he still “wins” the girl (Greno & Howard, 2010). This is the first successful male role model Disney puts forth who is likeable, but non-traditional. This character tells boys that it is okay not to have all of the answers. It is okay to figure things out as you go. And most importantly, it is okay not to be a controlling, aggressive alpha-male. Flynn provides boys with a much-needed boost away from a traditional macho man model of masculinity.
This trend of non-traditional male characters/love interests for Disney princesses has continued in one of Disney’s most recent films, Frozen (Buck & Lee, 2013). In this film, Kristoff plays the love interest to princess Anna. He challenges her ideas without demeaning her and is fully comfortable following her lead. Kristoff tells boys that strong women are attractive and interesting and worthy of love. He signals that women can be strong leaders, and that men need not be threatened by following independent women.
We often talk about the progression of female characters, of Disney princesses, without acknowledging the progression of male characters, princes, and love interests. It is important to recognize that love interests in Disney films teach boys what kind of men they are supposed to be and teach girls what kind of men are desirable as friends and partners. The change in gender representations for male characters in Disney films represents an important diversification of what a man can and should be.



References
Buck, C., & Lee, J. (Directors). (2013). Frozen [Motion picture]. USA: Walt Disney Studios.
Cottrell, W., Hand, D., Jackson, W., Morey, L., Pearce, P., & Sharpsteen, B. (Directors). (1937). Snow white and the seven dwarfs [Motion picture]. USA: Walt Disney Studios.
Geronimi, C., Jackson, W., Luske, H. (Directors). (1950). Cinderella [Motion picture]. USA: Walt Disney Studios.
Gilliam, K., & Wooden, S. R. (2008). Post-princess models of gender: The new man in Disney/Pixar. Journal of Popular Film & Television, 36(1), 2-8.
Greno, N., & Howard, B. (Directors). (2010). Tangled [Motion picture]. USA: Walt Disney Studios.
Lee, L. (2008). Understanding gender through Disney’s marriages: A study of young Korean immigrant girls. Early Childhood Education Journal, 36(1), 11-18.
Miller, R. S., & Perlman, D. (2009). Intimate relationships (5th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.



Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack as a White Woman // Katie Hannah-Fisher




Img src: https://fruitloopfeminism.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/clear-backpack.jpg

The Women’s March was a powerful, beautiful display of what can happen when we come together against the injustices we face, and fear to face throughout the Trump administration’s reign. However, if anyone looked closely enough, there were divisions among the marchers. While we came together as one, there are numerous battles that only segments of the population will ever face. Those ignored battles, injustices, or whatever you may choose to call them reminded me of that Invisible Knapsack that Peggy McIntosh unpacked in 1988. As a White woman, I feel it is necessary to reevaluate that knapsack. I have compiled a list of the privileges I can identify in my life based on the intersection of my race and gender, and urge my fellow women to add to this list.

  1. When I have children, people will assume my spouse is involved in their life.
  2. People may assume that my mood is related to the time of the month, but they will never blame it on my race.
  3. I can open any beauty magazine and see women who look like me on nearly every page.
  4. For the most part, the characters I watch on TV have the same values, goals, morals, and cultural norms as me.
  5. When I cry, people take action.
  6. People move over when I try to occupy their space on public transportation, without me even asking for it.
  7. People consider it polite to offer me their seat.
  8. When I complain about pain at the doctor, I am offered pain medications without judgment.
  9. Usually, people do not reach out and touch my body or hair without my permission.
  10. No one has ever credited any of my successes to my race, though at times they probably should have.
  11. Any mistake I make is seen as a discrete, individual issue- not a product of my race.
  12. I have a sense of freedom and belonging everywhere I travel.
  13. When it comes time to celebrate women throughout history, I can expect most of them to look like me.
  14. Products for my hair type are sold in every salon and beauty store I have ever been to.
  15. People believe nearly anything I tell them without question- they assume I am honest.
  16. No one would think twice about giving me a job in which I interact with the public or act as the face of the company.
  17. I have the opportunity to shape people’s opinion of me without them ever making assumptions about me based on my race.
  18. When people fight against sexism, I can be confident that they are fighting for people like me.
  19. When I am out, I drink if I want to without worrying about anyone assuming I have a substance abuse issue.
  20. The new president’s actions will probably not make me question my belonging in this country.  

Sunday, February 5, 2017

Feminism in the Time of Trump // Melissa M. Ertl


Photo from Associated Press (AP)

Donald Trump has claimed that “nobody has more respect for women” than he does.  However, his cabinet picks, in addition to his actions in his first few days in office, diametrically oppose his claim.  It is nothing short of horrifying to read about the men in the Trump presidential cabinet who have been accused of engaging in intimate partner violence (Jeltsen, 2016).  Trump himself has at least sixteen women who have accused him of sexual assault (Pearson, Vagianos, & Gray, 2016).  What are the implications of having a president whose actions are, time and time again, consistent with sexism and misogyny (e.g., Cohen, 2017)?
Someone only needs to review a few examples of Mr. Trump’s vitriolic attacks on women that demonstrate the former point.  In 1991, Trump called women “beautiful pieces of ass,” objectifying women and reducing them to a single body part rather than considering them as they truly are—complex humans with thoughts, ideas, and feelings.  In 1992, in an interview with New York Magazine, Trump gave away his technique for working with women: “You have to treat ‘em like shit.”  Furthermore, in 2011, Trump called breastfeeding “disgusting”; in essence, Donald Trump has no issue with women displaying their bodies in a sexual way for the pleasure of men, but when it is simply to care for their newborn children, it is somehow repulsive.   
The above photo went viral on social media on January 23rd when Trump signed into effect the global gag rule that effectively prevents foreign aid for nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) that discuss abortion as a potential option for women’s reproductive health needs (Kahn, 2017).  Surrounded exclusively by White men, Trump reinstated and expanded an executive order that will deny women access to safe abortions—and as a result, thousands of women will die across the world (Crockett, 2017).  Although the global gag rule is intended to reduce access to abortion, it has been found to actually do the opposite: When George. W. Bush reinstated the rule, it reduced access to contraception and led to more unwanted pregnancies (Crockett, 2017), which women then chose to terminate.  In other words, Trump’s executive order denies the right for millions of women to control their own bodies (i.e., denies their human rights), puts the lives of these vulnerable women at risk, and will have real global repercussions.
It should come as no surprise that women are rushing to Planned Parenthoods across the country to get intrauterine devices (IUDs) to prevent pregnancy (Cohen, 2017), since many fear that affordable contraceptive options will no longer be available to them in Trump’s America.  In fact, the number of IUD appointments at Planned Parenthoods has increased 900% since the election (Amanpour, 2017).  Planned Parenthood’s President, Cecile Richards, said that women “are desperately concerned that they might lose their access to health care” given Trump’s calls and actions to repeal the Affordable Care Act (Sanger-Katz, 2017) even before it is replaced with another method to procure life-sustaining health care.
But Tom Price, Mr. Trump’s cabinet pick to head the Health and Human Services Department, is somehow so out of touch with the reality of everyday Americans that he thinks affording birth control is something that all women are able to do with ease (and without the help of insurance).  In 2012, when a reporter asked Tom Price how low-income women would afford their birth control copays without the no-cost contraceptives provision of the Affordable Care Act, Price replied, “Bring me one woman who has been left behind. Bring me one. There’s not one” (Khazan, 2016).  It is clear that Tom Price paid no attention to statistics on the affordability of birth control before the Affordable Care Act—when approximately a third of women reported struggling to pay the cost, with copays ranging from $15 to $50 a month (Planned Parenthood, 2014).  Although $600 per year may not be much to Tom Price, it can be part of a rent payment, two months of groceries, two car payments, or two weeks of childcare costs.  This was a monetary burden placed solely on women, when contraception should be a concern for every person who is sexually active—not just women.  
With Trump’s impending repeal of the Affordable Care Act, women in the US will revert to spending their hard-earned money on contraceptives; all the while, the gender wage gap ensures that men enjoy more money for the same work (AAUW, 2016).  Women are not expected to reach pay equity until 2059 at the earliest (Institute for Women’s Policy Research, 2015), and this date stretches farther into the future when adjusted for race: For example, Black women will wait until 2124 for equal pay, and Latinas won’t reach pay equity until 2248—232 years from now—if trends in the last 30 years continue (Institute for Women’s Policy Research, 2016).  In the meantime, women continue to be taxed on basic necessities of being women through paying taxes on feminine hygiene products, for example.  On average, women in California pay about $7 per month for 40 years of tampons and sanitary napkins; statewide, this comes to over $20 million annually in taxes (Larimer, 2016).


Photo from Jeremy McLellan, @jeremymclellan

All around us, there are daily reminders that women do not have the societal benefits of men—that women’s position in society is lower due to the patriarchal structures of our society that perpetuate maleness as the standard.  Martin Belam, a writer for the Guardian in London, captioned the photo of Mr. Trump signing the global gag rule with: “As long as you live you’ll never see a photograph of 7 women signing legislation about what men can do with their reproductive organs.”  Other captions included, “If you’re wondering what patriarchy looks like: A group of white men watch as Trump reinstates the #GlobalGagRule” (Valenti, 2017), and “This group just made it more difficult for women to get access to health care worldwide. You tell me what’s wrong with this picture” (i.e., no women are a part of this decision; Harris, 2017).  Above all, the above photo demonstrates that we will have to fight to ensure that women’s rights truly are treated as human rights in the US for the next four years.  Despite the impending detrimental consequences for both women’s health and their rights in our country and across the globe, I know we are in good hands.  The women’s march was the largest day of protests in US history (Broomfield, 2017), with approximately one in 100 Americans marching to advocate support for women, immigrants, refugees, Black lives, and the LGBTQIA community, among many others.  Sister marches took place in 60 countries on seven continents (Wildman, 2017).  Signs rang out: “The future is female,” “no more wire hangers,” and “America is Brown; America is queer; America is female; America is great.”  Provided that the enthusiasm shown in the march translates to continued political activism, we can fight against the misogyny perpetuated by our lawmakers who prioritize controlling women’s bodies over the health and reproductive needs of women everywhere.

Written by: Melissa M. Ertl

References
AAUW. (2016). The simple truth about the gender pay gap. American Association of University Women. http://www.aauw.org/research/the-simple-truth-about-the-gender-pay-gap/
Amanpour, C. (2017). Demand for IUDs reportedly surging with Trump. CNN. Retrieved from http://www.cnn.com/videos/world/2017/01/09/intv-amanpour-cecile-richards-planned-parenthood.cnn
Cohen, E. (2017). Women rush to get IUDs because of Trump. CNN. Retrieved from http://www.cnn.com/2017/01/25/health/iuds-trump/index.html
Crockett, E. (2017). Trump reinstated the global gag rule. It won't stop abortion, but it will make it less safe. Vox. http://www.vox.com/identities/2017/1/23/14356582/trump-global-gag-rule-abortion
Institute for Women’s Policy Research. (2015). Pay equity and discrimination. Institute for Women’s Policy Research. http://www.iwpr.org/initiatives/pay-equity-and-discrimination
Institute for Women’s Policy Research. (2016). If current trends continue, Hispanic women will wait 232 years for equal pay; Black women will wait 108 years. Institute for Women’s Policy Research. http://www.iwpr.org/initiatives/pay-equity-and-discrimination
Jeltsen, M. (2016). Trump’s white house shaping up to be home for men accused of domestic abuse. Huffington Post. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/trump-administration-domestic-abuse_us_584b141de4b0bd9c3dfcd283
@JessicaValenti. (2017, January 23). Tweet text. Retrieved from https://twitter.com/JessicaValenti/status/823594304971173888
Kahn, M. (2017). President Trump just reinstated the "global gag rule," which will deny women all over the world access to abortion. Yahoo News. Retrieved from https://www.yahoo.com/style/president-trump-just-reinstated-global-180904183.html
@KamalaHarris. (2017, January 23). Tweet text. Retrieved from https://twitter.com/KamalaHarris/status/823639752314327040
Khazan, O. (2016). Tom Price: “Not one” woman struggled to afford birth control. The Atlantic. http://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2016/11/tom-price-not-one-woman-cant-afford-birth-control/509003/
Larimer, S. (2016). The ‘tampon tax,’ explained. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/01/08/the-tampon-tax-explained/?utm_term=.2b8f736a6dda
@MartinBelam. (2017, January 23). Tweet text. Retrieved from https://twitter.com/MartinBelam/status/823637000783798272
Planned Parenthood. (2014). Survey: Nearly three in four voters in America support fully covering prescription birth control. Planned Parenthood Federation of America. https://www.plannedparenthood.org/about-us/newsroom/press-releases/survey-nearly-three-four-voters-america-support-fully-covering-prescription-birth-control
Pearson, C., Vagianos, A., & Gray, E. (2016). A running list of the women who’ve accused Donald Trump of sexual assault. Huffington Post. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/a-running-list-of-all-the-women-whove-accused-donald-trump-of-sexual-assault_us_57ffae1fe4b0162c043a7212
Sanger-Katz, M. (2017). What does Trump’s executive order against Obamacare actually do? New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/21/upshot/what-does-the-order-against-the-health-law-actually-do.html

Wildman, S. (2017). The women’s march has now reached as far as Antarctica. (Really). Vox. Retrieved from http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/1/20/14335430/womens-march-antarctica-seven-continents-60-countries

Modesty In An Inappropriate Society // Aurelia Gooden, MA, MS



Imagine yourself as a young, unmarried woman living in Iran.  One day, you began to notice a strange, lower abdominal pain.  You suspect that it is a reproductive system problem and you make an appointment for a doctor’s visit.  Upon arriving, the nurse asks you to disrobe, but you find out that the doctor is male and there are no female doctors available.  It is against your religion and culture to be examined by a male doctor, especially before marriage, but there are no other options.  You must decide if you will allow the visit to proceed as planned and possibly ruin your chances for marriage later due to your culture and religion, or leave the clinic not knowing if you have a life-threatening reproductive system issue.

This is an issue for many women worldwide.  Women have varying degrees of modesty and, unlike popular belief, modesty is not simply a fear of being judged by mankind.  It can be a fear of being judged by God.  It can be a fear of turning one’s back on her culture.  It can also be a simple respect for her husband and allowing him to have a special access to her body that no one else has had or ever will have.  Yet, all too often, society expects women to suddenly abandon all religious beliefs and disrobe immediately when a male doctor appears in the examination room.  This expectation has been responsible for the deaths of women due to reproductive system cancers that were advanced by the time that the women were rushed to the emergency room.

There is no easy solution to this problem.  However, even beyond the twentieth century, male doctors have continued to outnumber female doctors in clinics and hospitals.  Therefore, we must reach the next generation by supporting organizations that provide scholarships to women in medicine.  We must also support organizations that provide educational programs to encourage more women to enter the field of medicine.


We cannot and should not try to change the religious and cultural beliefs of any woman. A woman’s body belongs to her and she should be able to decide the circumstances under which it can be viewed. Nevertheless, we can change the expectations of society so that the norm conforms to and provides for the needs of women.